Over 0–100 km/h, Macan GTS 95B.1 wins (5,06 s vs 5,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan GTS 95B.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,06 s−0,80 s | 5,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s−0,80 s | 14,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,40 s−1,65 s | 26,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 256 km/h+16 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,87 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan GTS 95B.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,42 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,19 s | 2,29 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,76 s | 4,12 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,06 s | 5,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,87 s | 8,07 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,56 s | 14,44 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,52 s | 25,85 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s | 14,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,40 s | 26,05 s |
| Top speed | 256 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Macan GTS hits 100 km/h in 5.06 s versus 5.86 s for the Bmw X4 xDrive30d. At this point, the Macan GTS leads by 0.80 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan GTS is doing 138 km/h against 129 km/h for the Bmw X4 xDrive30d. The gap is 0.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan GTS crosses the line in 13.37 s versus 14.18 s. The 0.81 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan GTS finishes in 24.40 s versus 26.04 s, with a 1.65 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan GTS is capped at 256 km/h, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.26 kg/hp vs 6.87 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.38 seconds. The 0.80 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan GTS 95B.1 wins (5,06 s vs 5,86 s).
Macan GTS 95B.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,06 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan GTS 95B.1: 360 hp, ratio 5,26 kg/hp. X4 xDrive30d G02: 265 hp, ratio 6,87 kg/hp.
Macan GTS 95B.1: 256 km/h. X4 xDrive30d G02: 240 km/h.