Among the 12 D-SUV 2015–2019, the Macan GTS ranks 9th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (5.1 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 5th of 12 in Top speed (256 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 7th of 12 in Power-to-weight (190 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
95B.1 · GENERATION 2017 → · FAMILY SUV
PorscheICE
Macan GTS
360 hp, 5,1 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2015–2019, the Macan GTS ranks 9th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 12 in Top speed, 7th of 12 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
360hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.1s
VMax 256 km/h
Cons.
12.4L
/100 km
Tank
74.951118L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Macan GTS
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Bi-turbo |
| Displacement | 2,995 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 365 hp |
| Combined power | 360 hp |
| Combined torque | 500 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 74.951118 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,1 s |
| VMax | 256 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,691 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,807 mm |
| Width | 1,933 mm |
| Height | 1,600 mm |
| Boot | 18 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,895 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 D-SUV, the Macan GTS ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.1 s 0-100 (9th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Macan GTS ranks 9th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 1.3 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (3.8 s).
Top speed: 256 km/h (5th of 12 in Top speed)
Top speed of 256 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Macan GTS stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2015–2019.
0–100 km/h9e / 12
5,1 s
Min 5,3 s · Porsche Macan SMax 3,8 s · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Top speed5e / 12
256 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw X3 M40dMax 283 km/h · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight7e / 12
190 hp/t
Min 172 hp/t · Bmw X3 M40dMax 279 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X3 M40i360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X3 M40i360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X4 M40i360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X4 M40i360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Macan 95B.1 range
Generation 95B.1 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 95B.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Macan GTS
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Macan GTS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 5.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan GTS vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.