Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan GTS 95B.1 gagne (5,06 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan GTS 95B.1 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,06 s−3,29 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s−2,81 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,40 s−5,01 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 256 km/h+41 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan GTS 95B.1 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,19 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,76 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,06 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,87 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,56 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,52 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,38 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,40 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 256 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Macan GTS hits 100 km/h in 5.06 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Macan GTS leads by 3.29 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan GTS is doing 138 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 1.87 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan GTS crosses the line in 13.37 s versus 16.19 s. The 2.81 s gap represents roughly 106 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan GTS finishes in 24.40 s versus 29.41 s, with a 5.02 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan GTS is capped at 256 km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.26 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 3.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan GTS 95B.1 gagne (5,06 s vs 8,35 s).
Macan GTS 95B.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,06 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan GTS 95B.1 : 360 hp, ratio 5,26 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Macan GTS 95B.1 : 256 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.