Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.1 wins (5,37 s vs 5,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan S 95B.1 | Stelvio Veloce | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,37 s−0,39 s | 5,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,66 s−0,46 s | 14,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,85 s−1,16 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 251 km/h+21 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,49 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan S 95B.1 | Stelvio Veloce |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,39 s | 1,32 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,33 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,00 s | 4,12 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,37 s | 5,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,24 s | 7,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,22 s | 14,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,77 s | 26,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,66 s | 14,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,85 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Macan S hits 100 km/h in 5.37 s versus 5.76 s for the Stelvio Veloce. The 0.39 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Macan S is doing 135 km/h against 129 km/h for the Stelvio Veloce. The gap is 0.19 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan S crosses the line in 13.65 s versus 14.12 s. The 0.46 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Macan S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan S finishes in 24.85 s versus 26.01 s, with a 1.16 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan S is capped at 251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Stelvio Veloce at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.49 kg/hp vs 6.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.26 seconds. The 0.39 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.1 wins (5,37 s vs 5,76 s).
Macan S 95B.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan S 95B.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,49 kg/hp. Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp.
Macan S 95B.1: 251 km/h. Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h.