Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 gagne (5,63 s vs 5,78 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Panamera 4 970.1 | F-TYPE P300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,78 s | 5,63 s+0,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,11 s | 13,69 s+0,42 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,92 s | 24,35 s+1,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 243 km/h | 250 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,99 kg/hp | 5,32 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Panamera 4 970.1 | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,14 s | 2,69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,08 s | 4,30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,78 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,07 s | 7,17 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,44 s | 11,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,37 s | 18,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,11 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,92 s | 24,35 s |
| Top speed limited | 243 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 304 hp | Aluminum block and heads |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-TYPE P300 2022 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 5.78 s for the Panamera 4. Despite the faster sprint time, the Panamera 4 is 9 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Panamera 4 is doing 128 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 0.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 14.10 s. The 0.41 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 178 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 25.92 s, with a 1.56 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (243 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Panamera 4 is capped at 257 km/h, the F-TYPE P300 at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.99 kg/hp vs 5.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.32 seconds. The 0.16 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 gagne (5,63 s vs 5,78 s).
Panamera 4 970.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,78 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Panamera 4 970.1 : 304 hp, ratio 5,99 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300 : 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
Panamera 4 970.1 : 243 km/h. F-TYPE P300 : 250 km/h.