Sur 0–100 km/h, Megane 3 RS 265 gagne (6,08 s vs 6,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Megane 3 RS 265 | Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,08 s−0,57 s | 6,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,03 s−0,73 s | 14,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,97 s−1,74 s | 26,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+19 km/h | 231 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,19 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Megane 3 RS 265 | Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,64 s | 1,73 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,74 s | 2,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,58 s | 4,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,08 s | 6,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,69 s | 8,67 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,40 s | 15,01 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,91 s | 27,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,03 s | 14,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,97 s | 26,71 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 231 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 376 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
Off the line, the Megane 3 RS 265 hits 100 km/h in 6.08 s versus 6.65 s for the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220. At this point, the Megane 3 RS 265 leads by 0.57 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Megane 3 RS 265 is doing 137 km/h against 127 km/h for the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220. The gap is 0.37 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Megane 3 RS 265 crosses the line in 14.03 s versus 14.76 s. The 0.73 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Megane 3 RS 265 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 193 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Megane 3 RS 265 finishes in 24.97 s versus 26.71 s, with a 1.74 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Megane 3 RS 265 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.19 kg/hp vs 5.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.16 seconds. The 0.57 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Megane 3 RS 265 gagne (6,08 s vs 6,65 s).
Megane 3 RS 265 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,08 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Megane 3 RS 265 : 265 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp. Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 : 220 hp, ratio 5,64 kg/hp.
Megane 3 RS 265 : 250 km/h. Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 : 231 km/h.