Over 0–100 km/h, Megane 4 RS 280 wins (5,80 s vs 6,08 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Megane 4 RS 280 | Megane 3 RS 265 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.80 s | 6.08 s | 0.28 s · Megane 4 RS 280 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.87 s | 14.03 s | 0.16 s · Megane 4 RS 280 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.70 s | 24.97 s | 0.27 s · Megane 4 RS 280 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.18 kg/hp | 5.19 kg/hp | better ratio · Megane 4 RS 280 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Megane 4 RS 280 | Megane 3 RS 265 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.67 s | 1.64 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.79 s | 2.74 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.37 s | 4.58 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.80 s | 6.08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.41 s | 7.69 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.96 s | 12.40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19.08 s | 19.91 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13.87 s | 14.03 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.70 s | 24.97 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 390 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 360 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 376 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Megane 4 RS 280 hits 100 km/h in 5.80 s versus 6.08 s for the Megane 3 RS 265. At this point, the Megane 4 RS 280 leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Megane 4 RS 280 is doing 138 km/h against 137 km/h for the Megane 3 RS 265. The gap is 0.11 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Megane 4 RS 280 crosses the line in 13.86 s versus 14.03 s. The 0.16 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Megane 4 RS 280 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 194 km/h versus 193 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Megane 4 RS 280 finishes in 24.70 s versus 24.97 s, with a 0.27 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Megane 4 RS 280 and the Megane 3 RS 265 are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.18 kg/hp vs 5.19 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.63 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Megane 4 RS 280 wins (5,80 s vs 6,08 s).
Megane 4 RS 280 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,80 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Megane 4 RS 280: 280 hp, ratio 5,18 kg/hp. Megane 3 RS 265: 265 hp, ratio 5,19 kg/hp.
Megane 4 RS 280: 250 km/h. Megane 3 RS 265: 250 km/h.