Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range RWD gagne (5,72 s vs 7,70 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 Long Range RWD | IS 300 AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,72 s−1,98 s | 7,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s−1,50 s | 15,66 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,28 s−1,47 s | 27,75 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 224 km/h+14 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,71 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,08 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 Long Range RWD | IS 300 AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,51 s | 2,13 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,52 s | 3,60 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,19 s | 5,73 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,72 s | 7,70 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,74 s | 10,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,66 s | 16,98 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 29,94 s | 28,19 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,16 s | 15,66 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,28 s | 27,75 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 446 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 735 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Model 3 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 5.72 s versus 7.70 s for the IS 300 AWD. The instant torque of 446 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model 3 Long Range RWD leads by 1.98 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Long Range RWD is doing 131 km/h against 122 km/h for the IS 300 AWD. The gap is 1.28 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.16 s versus 15.66 s. The 1.50 s gap represents roughly 63 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Long Range RWD finishes in 26.28 s versus 27.75 s, with a 1.47 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (224 vs 210 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Long Range RWD is capped at 225 km/h, the IS 300 AWD at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.57 seconds. The 1.98 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range RWD gagne (5,72 s vs 7,70 s).
Model 3 Long Range RWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,72 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model 3 Long Range RWD : 258 hp, ratio 6,71 kg/hp. IS 300 AWD : 245 hp, ratio 7,08 kg/hp.
Model 3 Long Range RWD : 224 km/h. IS 300 AWD : 210 km/h.