Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 10,41 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 Performance | 216i Active Tourer G42 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,04 s−7,37 s | 10,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,13 s−6,38 s | 17,51 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s−11,43 s | 31,92 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+55 km/h | 206 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,62 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,05 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 Performance | 216i Active Tourer G42 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,82 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,37 s | 3,75 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,26 s | 7,14 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,04 s | 10,41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,03 s | 14,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,97 s | 28,87 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,20 s | 74,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,13 s | 17,51 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s | 31,92 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 206 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 769 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 844 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 122 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 230 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 470 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Seven-speed Steptronic dual-clutch transmission |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.04 s versus 10.41 s for the Bmw 216i Active Tourer. The instant torque of 769 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 7.37 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 162 km/h against 105 km/h for the Bmw 216i Active Tourer. The gap is 4.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.12 s versus 17.50 s. The 6.38 s gap represents roughly 209 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 146 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 20.48 s versus 31.91 s, with a 11.43 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the Bmw 216i Active Tourer at 206 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.46 seconds. The 7.37 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 10,41 s).
Model 3 Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model 3 Performance: 510 hp, ratio 3,62 kg/hp. 216i Active Tourer G42: 122 hp, ratio 12,05 kg/hp.
Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h. 216i Active Tourer G42: 206 km/h.