Over 0–100 km/h, Model X 90D wins (5,03 s vs 6,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X 90D | Q6 SUV e-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,03 s−1,79 s | 6,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,07 s−1,94 s | 15,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,32 s−3,74 s | 27,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 249 km/h+39 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,28 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X 90D | Q6 SUV e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,49 s | 1,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,49 s | 3,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,99 s | 5,19 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,03 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 8,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,16 s | 15,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,94 s | 28,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,07 s | 15,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,32 s | 27,06 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 532 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 967 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 441 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 485 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model X 90D hits 100 km/h in 5.03 s versus 6.82 s for the Q6 SUV e-tron. At this point, the Model X 90D leads by 1.79 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X 90D is doing 147 km/h against 128 km/h for the Q6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 1.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X 90D crosses the line in 13.07 s versus 15.00 s. The 1.94 s gap represents roughly 82 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X 90D continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X 90D finishes in 23.32 s versus 27.06 s, with a 3.74 s lead.
The Model X 90D features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Q6 SUV e-tron’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X 90D is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q6 SUV e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.59 kg/hp vs 7.28 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 1.79 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model X 90D wins (5,03 s vs 6,82 s).
Model X 90D goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model X 90D: 532 hp, ratio 4,59 kg/hp. Q6 SUV e-tron: 302 hp, ratio 7,28 kg/hp.
Model X 90D: 249 km/h. Q6 SUV e-tron: 210 km/h.