Sur 0–100 km/h, RS Q8 SUV gagne (3,87 s vs 4,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Long Range | RS Q8 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,29 s | 3,87 s+0,43 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,14 s | 11,88 s+0,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,65 s | 21,56 s+0,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,67 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,86 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Long Range | RS Q8 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,28 s | 1,08 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,13 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 2,90 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,29 s | 3,87 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,30 s | 5,01 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,29 s | 8,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,64 s | 12,77 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 12,14 s | 11,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,65 s | 21,56 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 315 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the RS Q8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 3.87 s versus 4.30 s for the Model X Long Range. Despite lacking instant torque, 600 hp of power compensates. At this point, the RS Q8 SUV leads by 0.43 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS Q8 SUV is doing 156 km/h against 158 km/h for the Model X Long Range. The gap is 0.30 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS Q8 SUV crosses the line in 11.88 s versus 12.14 s. The 0.27 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows.
At 1,000 metres, the RS Q8 SUV finishes in 21.56 s versus 21.65 s, with just 0.09 s to spare. The Model X Long Range fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Model X Long Range and the RS Q8 SUV are governed to 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.92 seconds. The 0.43 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS Q8 SUV gagne (3,87 s vs 4,29 s).
Model X Long Range passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,67 kg/hp. RS Q8 SUV : 600 hp, ratio 3,86 kg/hp.
Model X Long Range : 250 km/h. RS Q8 SUV : 250 km/h.