Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range wins (4,11 s vs 7,34 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Long Range | Q5 Sportback | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,11 s−3,23 s | 7,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,93 s−3,36 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,31 s−7,26 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,66 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Long Range | Q5 Sportback |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,23 s | 1,16 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,27 s | 4,82 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,11 s | 7,34 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,06 s | 10,56 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,91 s | 20,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,04 s | 40,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,93 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,31 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 352 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 970 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Model X Long Range hits 100 km/h in 4.11 s versus 7.34 s for the Q5 Sportback. The instant torque of 660 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model X Long Range leads by 3.23 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Long Range is doing 160 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q5 Sportback. The gap is 1.79 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Long Range crosses the line in 11.92 s versus 15.28 s. The 3.36 s gap represents roughly 126 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Long Range finishes in 21.31 s versus 28.56 s, with a 7.26 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Long Range is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q5 Sportback at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.41 seconds. The 3.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range wins (4,11 s vs 7,34 s).
Model X Long Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,11 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model X Long Range: 670 hp, ratio 3,51 kg/hp. Q5 Sportback: 204 hp, ratio 9,66 kg/hp.
Model X Long Range: 250 km/h. Q5 Sportback: 226 km/h.