Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range gagne (4,11 s vs 5,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Long Range | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,11 s−1,71 s | 5,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,93 s−2,23 s | 14,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,31 s−4,75 s | 26,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,05 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Long Range | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,23 s | 1,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 2,34 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,27 s | 4,13 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,11 s | 5,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,06 s | 8,00 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,91 s | 14,39 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,04 s | 26,59 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,93 s | 14,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,31 s | 26,06 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 352 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Model X Long Range hits 100 km/h in 4.11 s versus 5.82 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Model X Long Range leads by 1.71 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Long Range is doing 160 km/h against 129 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.25 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Long Range crosses the line in 11.92 s versus 14.16 s. The 2.23 s gap represents roughly 95 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Long Range finishes in 21.31 s versus 26.06 s, with a 4.75 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Long Range is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.51 kg/hp vs 6.05 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.29 seconds. The 1.71 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range gagne (4,11 s vs 5,82 s).
Model X Long Range passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,11 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,51 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 394 hp, ratio 6,05 kg/hp.
Model X Long Range : 250 km/h. Q7 SUV : 235 km/h.