Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance gagne (3,04 s vs 4,11 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Long Range | Model 3 Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,11 s | 3,04 s+1,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,93 s | 11,13 s+0,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,31 s | 20,49 s+0,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 261 km/h−11 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,62 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Long Range | Model 3 Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,23 s | 0,82 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 1,37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,27 s | 2,26 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,11 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,06 s | 4,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,91 s | 6,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,04 s | 11,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,93 s | 11,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,31 s | 20,49 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 261 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 352 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 769 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 844 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.04 s versus 4.11 s for the Model X Long Range. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 1.07 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 162 km/h against 160 km/h for the Model X Long Range. The gap is 0.78 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.12 s versus 11.92 s. The 0.80 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 224 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 20.48 s versus 21.31 s, with a 0.82 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 261 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Long Range is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Model 3 Performance at 261 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.51 kg/hp vs 3.62 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.65 seconds. The 1.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance gagne (3,04 s vs 4,11 s).
Model X Long Range passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,11 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,51 kg/hp. Model 3 Performance : 510 hp, ratio 3,62 kg/hp.
Model X Long Range : 250 km/h. Model 3 Performance : 261 km/h.