Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance gagne (3,05 s vs 7,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Performance | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s−4,02 s | 7,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s−4,19 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s−8,17 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h+36 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Performance | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,48 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,45 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,08 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. The instant torque of 1,139 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 4.02 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Performance is doing 168 km/h against 117 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 2.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Performance crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 15.11 s. The 4.19 s gap represents roughly 157 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Performance finishes in 19.92 s versus 28.09 s, with a 8.17 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Performance is capped at 262 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 4.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance gagne (3,05 s vs 7,07 s).
Model X Performance passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,05 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X Performance : 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
Model X Performance : 262 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.