Gen1 · GENERATION 2020 · LARGE SUV
TeslaBEV

Model X Performance

778 hp, 487 km range, 3,0 s 0-100 : among the 7 E-SUV electric 2018–2022, the Model X Performance ranks 6th of 7 in WLTP range, 3rd of 6 in DC charge power, 2nd of 7 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate74315,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhRange →

Power

778hp

1139 Nm · 778 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

3.0s

VMax 262 km/h

Range

487km

WLTP

DC charging

250kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications Tesla Model X Performance

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique778 hp
Combined power778 hp
Couple1139 Nm
GearboxMono-rapport Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity100 kWh
Range WLTP487 km
Charge AC max11.5 kW
Charge DC max250 kW
Conso élec WLTP23.6 kWh/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h3,0 s
VMax262 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length5,037 mm
Wheelbase2,964 mm
Width2,073 mm
Height1,684 mm
Kerb weight2,459 kg
Cd0.25

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 7 E-SUV electric, the Model X Performance ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. 2nd of 7 in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s).

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Tesla Model X Long Range (1st with 579 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Xpeng G9 (1st with 300 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 487 km WLTP (6th of 7 in WLTP range)

The Model X Performance offers 487 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Tesla Model X Long Range (579 km).

Charging: 250 kW DC (3rd of 6 in DC charge power)

The Model X Performance accepts up to 250 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Xpeng G9 (300 kW).

Segment positioning

Where the Model X Performance stands against E-SUV electric

Comparison across 7 E-SUV electric marketed between 2018–2022.

WLTP range6e / 7
487 km
Min 425 km · BMW iX xDrive40Max 579 km · Tesla Model X Long Range
DC charge power3e / 6
250 kW
Min 250 kW · Tesla Model X Long RangeMax 300 kW · Xpeng G9
0–100 km/h2e / 7
3,0 s
Min 8,6 s · Xpeng G9Max 2,6 s · Tesla Model X Plaid

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Tesla Model X Gen1 range

Generation Gen1 launched in 2015. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the Gen1

Compare

Popular duels involving the Model X Performance

Frequently asked questions

Tesla Model X Performance: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 7 E-SUV electric 2018–2022, the Model X Performance ranks 6th of 7 in WLTP range (487 km, behind the Tesla Model X Long Range), 3rd of 6 in DC charge power (250 kW, behind the Xpeng G9), 2nd of 7 in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s, behind the Tesla Model X Plaid).

487 km WLTP announced - making it the 6th of 7 in autonomie du segment out of 7 models. The reference is the Tesla Model X Long Range (579 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.