Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 5,28 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| GR Supra 2.0 | A110 Pure 252 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 4,55 s+0,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,53 s | 12,62 s+0,91 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,52 s | 22,69 s+1,83 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 272 km/h | 277 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,79 kg/hp | 4,31 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | GR Supra 2.0 | A110 Pure 252 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,34 s | 1,34 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,23 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,82 s | 3,55 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 4,55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,99 s | 5,87 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,97 s | 9,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,63 s | 14,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,53 s | 12,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,52 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h | 277 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 495 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Sport Automatic (ZF) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 103 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 Pure 252 hits 100 km/h in 4.56 s versus 5.28 s for the GR Supra 2.0. At this point, the A110 Pure 252 leads by 0.73 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 Pure 252 is doing 151 km/h against 137 km/h for the GR Supra 2.0. The gap is 0.48 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 Pure 252 crosses the line in 12.61 s versus 13.52 s. The 0.91 s gap represents roughly 42 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 Pure 252 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 Pure 252 finishes in 22.69 s versus 24.51 s, with a 1.83 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (272 vs 277 km/h), preventing any comeback.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.79 kg/hp vs 4.31 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.11 seconds. The 0.73 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 5,28 s).
GR Supra 2.0 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,28 secondes (simulation calibrée).
GR Supra 2.0 : 258 hp, ratio 5,79 kg/hp. A110 Pure 252 : 256 hp, ratio 4,31 kg/hp.
GR Supra 2.0 : 272 km/h. A110 Pure 252 : 277 km/h.