Over 0–100 km/h, GR Supra 2.0 wins (5,28 s vs 7,66 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| GR Supra 2.0 | 220d Convertible F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s−2,38 s | 7,66 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,53 s−2,18 s | 15,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,52 s−3,82 s | 28,34 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 272 km/h+47 km/h | 225 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,79 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,34 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | GR Supra 2.0 | 220d Convertible F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,34 s | 2,09 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,23 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,82 s | 5,56 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 7,66 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,99 s | 10,36 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,97 s | 18,42 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,63 s | 34,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,53 s | 15,71 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,52 s | 28,34 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h | 225 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 495 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Sport Automatic (ZF) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 585 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (8-speed Steptronic) |
Off the line, the GR Supra 2.0 hits 100 km/h in 5.28 s versus 7.66 s for the 220d Convertible. At this point, the GR Supra 2.0 leads by 2.38 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the GR Supra 2.0 is doing 137 km/h against 120 km/h for the 220d Convertible. The gap is 1.53 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the GR Supra 2.0 crosses the line in 13.52 s versus 15.71 s. The 2.19 s gap represents roughly 87 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the GR Supra 2.0 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 167 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the GR Supra 2.0 finishes in 24.51 s versus 28.34 s, with a 3.82 s lead.
Electronically capped at 225 km/h, the 220d Convertible never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.79 kg/hp vs 8.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.00 seconds. The 2.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, GR Supra 2.0 wins (5,28 s vs 7,66 s).
GR Supra 2.0 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,28 seconds (calibrated simulation).
GR Supra 2.0: 258 hp, ratio 5,79 kg/hp. 220d Convertible F22: 190 hp, ratio 8,34 kg/hp.
GR Supra 2.0: 272 km/h. 220d Convertible F22: 225 km/h.