Sur 0–100 km/h, G6 gagne (6,82 s vs 6,89 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G6 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s−0,07 s | 6,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,96 s−0,04 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,82 s−0,90 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 226 km/h−26 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,99 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G6 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 1,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,01 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,00 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s | 6,89 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,13 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,54 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,78 s | 33,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,96 s | 15,00 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,82 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 440 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the G6 hits 100 km/h in 6.82 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. The instant torque of 440 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.07 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 119 km/h against 126 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.26 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the G6 crosses the line in 14.96 s versus 15.00 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the G6 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the G6 finishes in 26.81 s versus 27.71 s, with a 0.90 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (226 km/h), the Q7 SUV never recovers its launch deficit.
The Q7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the G6’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G6 is capped at 200 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 0.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, G6 gagne (6,82 s vs 6,89 s).
G6 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,82 secondes (simulation calibrée).
G6 : 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
G6 : 200 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.