Sur 0–100 km/h, G6 gagne (3,80 s vs 7,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| G6 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,80 s−3,27 s | 7,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,03 s−3,08 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,89 s−5,20 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 226 km/h−26 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,41 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | G6 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,76 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,86 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,80 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,01 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,99 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,03 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,89 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor AWD |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the G6 hits 100 km/h in 3.80 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. The instant torque of 660 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the G6 leads by 3.27 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the G6 is doing 152 km/h against 117 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.83 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the G6 crosses the line in 12.03 s versus 15.11 s. The 3.08 s gap represents roughly 118 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the G6 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the G6 finishes in 22.89 s versus 28.09 s, with a 5.20 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (226 km/h), the Q7 SUV never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G6 is capped at 200 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 3.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, G6 gagne (3,80 s vs 7,07 s).
G6 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,80 secondes (simulation calibrée).
G6 : 480 hp, ratio 4,41 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
G6 : 200 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.