Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT and G6 are neck and neck (3,73 s vs 3,80 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Mustang Mach-E GT | G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s−0,07 s | 3,80 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,00 s−0,03 s | 12,03 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,87 s−0,02 s | 22,89 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,33 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,41 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Mustang Mach-E GT | G6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,02 s | 1,06 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,70 s | 1,76 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,78 s | 2,86 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s | 3,80 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,94 s | 5,01 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,62 s | 8,63 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,27 s | 13,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,00 s | 12,03 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,87 s | 22,89 stight gap |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 860 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor AWD |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E GT hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 3.80 s for the G6. The 0.07 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT is doing 152 km/h against 152 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.05 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E GT crosses the line in 11.99 s versus 12.03 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory - both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.02 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere - range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Mustang Mach-E GT and the G6 are governed to 200 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.33 kg/hp vs 4.41 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.75 seconds. The 0.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT and G6 are neck and neck (3,73 s vs 3,80 s, no significant gap).
Mustang Mach-E GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Mustang Mach-E GT: 487 hp, ratio 4,33 kg/hp. G6: 480 hp, ratio 4,41 kg/hp.
Mustang Mach-E GT: 200 km/h. G6: 200 km/h.