Over 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 and 120d F40 are neck and neck (7,38 s vs 7,45 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| MONA M03 | 120d F40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,45 s | 7,38 s+0,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s | 15,41 s+0,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,51 s−0,39 s | 27,90 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 231 km/h−31 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,60 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,63 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | MONA M03 | 120d F40 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,16 s | 1,87 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,61 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,80 s | 5,29 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,45 s | 7,38 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,58 s | 9,97 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,40 s | 17,66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,72 s | 32,84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,48 s | 15,41 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,51 s | 27,90 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 231 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 120d hits 100 km/h in 7.38 s versus 7.45 s for the MONA M03. Despite lacking instant torque, 190 hp of power compensates. The 0.07 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 120d is doing 121 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.27 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 120d crosses the line in 15.41 s versus 15.48 s. The 0.07 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The MONA M03 maxes out at 200 km/h while the Bmw 120d keeps accelerating towards 231 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.08 s.
Around 493 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the MONA M03 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 31 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the MONA M03 finishes in 27.51 s versus 27.90 s. The 0.39 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the MONA M03 is capped at 200 km/h, the Bmw 120d at 231 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.54 seconds. The 0.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 and 120d F40 are neck and neck (7,38 s vs 7,45 s, no significant gap).
MONA M03 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,45 seconds (calibrated simulation).
MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp. 120d F40: 190 hp, ratio 7,63 kg/hp.
MONA M03: 200 km/h. 120d F40: 231 km/h.