Among the 76 saloons 2020–2024, the C 220 d ranks 11th of 76 in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 54th of 76 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive).
W206 · GENERATION 2022 → · SALOON
MercedesICE
C 220 d
200 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 76 saloons 2020–2024, the C 220 d ranks 11th of 76 in Combined consumption, 54th of 76 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
200hp
440 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.3s
VMax 237 km/h
Cons.
5.0L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Mercedes C 220 d
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,993 cm³ |
| Power | 200 hp |
| Couple | 440 Nm |
| Gearbox | 9 rapports |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5.0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,3 s |
| VMax | 237 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,751 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,865 mm |
| Width | 1,820 mm |
| Height | 1,438 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,640 kg |
| Cd | 0.24 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 131 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 76 saloons, the C 220 d ranks (top 11 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 11th of 76 in Combined consumption (5.0 L/100).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.0 L/100 L/100 (11th of 76 in Combined consumption)
The C 220 d consumes 5.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the C 220 d stands against saloons
Comparison across 76 saloons marketed between 2020–2024.
Combined consumption11e / 76
5 L/100
Min 14.9 L/100 · Lexus IS 500 F Sport RWDMax 4.2 L/100 · Bmw 420d
0–100 km/h54e / 76
7,3 s
Min 8,7 s · Bmw 318i TouringMax 3,5 s · Bmw M4 Competition with M xDrive
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
S60 B4197 hp · 0-100 8.0 s
A5 Avant204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
A5 Sedan204 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
A5 Sedan TDI quattro S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Mercedes C W206 range
Generation W206 launched in 2021. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the W206
Compare
Popular duels involving the C 220 d
Frequently asked questions
Mercedes C 220 d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 5.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the C 220 d vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.