Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /sports car
AA110vsB216iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsA110 · 216i

Alpine A110 Pure 252 vs BMW 216i Gran Tourer F22

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

sports car · 2017 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AlpinePetrol

A110 Pure 252

256 ch · 2017

VS
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

216i Gran Tourer F22

109 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAlpine A110 Pure 252

7h06charging included

1 stop · 99.22 €

Gap5 minin favour of 216i Gran Tourer
BBMW 216i Gran Tourer F22

7h01no stop

0 stops · 85.77 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureA110 Pure 252216i Gran Tourer F22Gap
Total time7h067h015 min · 216i Gran Tourer F22
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · 216i Gran Tourer F22
Cost of energy used99.22 €85.77 €13.45 € · 216i Gran Tourer F22

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AlpinePetrol
A110 Pure 252
100%
686 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +41 L · 87.88 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
99.22 €
Cost of energy used
BMWPetrolFastest
216i Gran Tourer F22
100%
1000 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
85.77 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the 216i Gran Tourer F22 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 216i Gran Tourer F22 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the A110 Pure 252.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (6,8 L/100km for A110 Pure 252 and 5,9 L/100km for 216i Gran Tourer F22) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 5,9 L/100km (A110 Pure 252) and 5,1 L/100km (216i Gran Tourer F22). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Alpine A110 Pure 252

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L686 km40 L consumed0.128 €/km87.88 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L89 km5 L consumed0.127 €/km11.34 €
Trip total99.22 €

BMW 216i Gran Tourer F22

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km40 L consumed0.111 €/km85.77 €
Trip total85.77 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
6.8 L/100 km · 5.9 L/100 km
Fuel tank
45 L · 51 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AlpinePetrol

A110 Pure 252

256 ch · 2017

BMWPetrol

216i Gran Tourer F22

109 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

CitroenVSBMW

Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD vs 216i Gran Tourer

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 216i Gran Tourer

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 216i Gran Tourer

XpengVSBMW

X9 vs 216i Gran Tourer

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 216i Gran Tourer F22 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 99.22 € (A110 Pure 252) and 85.77 € (216i Gran Tourer F22). For reference, an equivalent BMW M340i (~9.5 L/100 km) would cost about 136 € in fuel.