Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /large SUV
AQ7vsBX2Diesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ7 · X2

Audi Q7 SUV vs BMW X2 xDrive20d F39

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

large SUV · 2026 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiDiesel

Q7 SUV

231 ch · 2026

VS
BMWDieselPlus rapide

X2 xDrive20d F39

190 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi Q7 SUV

7h16charging included

3 stops · 507.89 €

Gap15 minin favour of X2 xDrive20d
BBMW X2 xDrive20d F39

7h01no stop

0 stops · 75.68 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ7 SUVX2 xDrive20d F39Gap
Total time7h167h0115 min · X2 xDrive20d F39
Charging stops3 stops0 stops3 stops · X2 xDrive20d F39
Cost of energy used507.89 €75.68 €432.21 € · X2 xDrive20d F39

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiDiesel
Q7 SUV
100%
224 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +68 L · 146.47 €
Refuel 2
5 min · +68 L · 146.47 €
Refuel 3
5 min · +68 L · 146.47 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h16
3
Stops
7h16
Duration
507.89 €
Cost of energy used
BMWDieselFastest
X2 xDrive20d F39
100%
1133 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
75.68 €
Cost of energy used

The 15-minute lead of the X2 xDrive20d F39 does not come from driving speed, but from 3 fewer charging stops on this route (0 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the X2 xDrive20d F39 versus 3 stops totalling 15 min for the Q7 SUV.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (8,4 L/100km for Q7 SUV and 4,9 L/100km for X2 xDrive20d F39) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 30,2 L/100km (Q7 SUV) and 4,5 L/100km (X2 xDrive20d F39). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi Q7 SUV

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L224 km68 L consumed0.654 €/km146.47 €
Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L224 km68 L consumed0.654 €/km146.47 €
Limonest, A6 → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L224 km68 L consumed0.654 €/km146.47 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L104 km32 L consumed0.658 €/km68.46 €
Trip total507.89 €

BMW X2 xDrive20d F39

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km35 L consumed0.098 €/km75.68 €
Trip total75.68 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
8.4 L/100 km · 4.9 L/100 km
Fuel tank
75 L · 51 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiDiesel

Q7 SUV

231 ch · 2026

BMWDiesel

X2 xDrive20d F39

190 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

Q7 SUV vs X5 xDrive25d

BMWVSAudi

X2 xDrive20d vs Q3 Sportback

PorscheVSAudi

Cayenne Diesel vs Q7 SUV

BMWVSPeugeot

X2 xDrive20d vs 3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the X2 xDrive20d F39 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 507.89 € (Q7 SUV) and 75.68 € (X2 xDrive20d F39). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.