Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact
ARS 3vsBE-PACEPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsRS 3 · E-PACE

Audi RS 3 Sportback vs Jaguar E-PACE P200

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact · 2026 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiPetrol

RS 3 Sportback

400 ch · 2026

VS
JaguarPetrolPlus rapide

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi RS 3 Sportback

7h16charging included

3 stops · 425.48 €

Gap10 minin favour of E-PACE P200
BJaguar E-PACE P200

7h06charging included

1 stop · 161.87 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureRS 3 SportbackE-PACE P200Gap
Total time7h167h0610 min · E-PACE P200
Charging stops3 stops1 stop2 stops · E-PACE P200
Cost of energy used425.48 €161.87 €263.61 € · E-PACE P200

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiPetrol
RS 3 Sportback
100%
196 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +50 L · 107.41 €
Refuel 2
5 min · +50 L · 107.41 €
Refuel 3
5 min · +50 L · 107.41 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h16
3
Stops
7h16
Duration
425.48 €
Cost of energy used
JaguarPetrolFastest
E-PACE P200
100%
636 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +61 L · 132.80 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
161.87 €
Cost of energy used

The 10-minute lead of the E-PACE P200 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (1 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the E-PACE P200 versus 3 stops totalling 15 min for the RS 3 Sportback.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (9,4 L/100km for RS 3 Sportback and 7,7 L/100km for E-PACE P200) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 25,3 L/100km (RS 3 Sportback) and 9,6 L/100km (E-PACE P200). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi RS 3 Sportback

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L196 km50 L consumed0.548 €/km107.41 €
Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L196 km50 L consumed0.548 €/km107.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L196 km50 L consumed0.548 €/km107.41 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L188 km48 L consumed0.549 €/km103.24 €
Trip total425.48 €

Jaguar E-PACE P200

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L636 km61 L consumed0.209 €/km132.80 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L139 km13 L consumed0.209 €/km29.06 €
Trip total161.87 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
9.4 L/100 km · 7.7 L/100 km
Fuel tank
55 L · 68 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiPetrol

RS 3 Sportback

400 ch · 2026

JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

M2 Competition vs RS 3 Sportback

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSBMW

RS 3 Sportback vs M240i Coupé

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the E-PACE P200 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 425.48 € (RS 3 Sportback) and 161.87 € (E-PACE P200). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.