Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
A330dHybridvsBA5Diesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs330d · A5

BMW 330d F30 vs Audi A5 Sedan

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2013 vs 2026 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWHybrid

330d F30

258 ch · 2013

VS
AudiDiesel

A5 Sedan

204 ch · 2026

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW 330d F30

7h01no stop

0 stops · 70.63 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BAudi A5 Sedan

7h01no stop

0 stops · 111.00 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
Measure330d F30A5 SedanGap
Total time7h017h01Less than a minute apart
Charging stops0 stops0 stopsSame
Cost of energy used70.63 €111.00 €40.37 € · 330d F30

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWHybrid
330d F30
100%
1357 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
70.63 €
Cost of energy used
AudiDiesel
A5 Sedan
100%
909 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
111.00 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the 330d F30 versus no stop for the A5 Sedan.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (4,7 L/100km for 330d F30 and 5,5 L/100km for A5 Sedan) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 4,2 L/100km (330d F30) and 6,6 L/100km (A5 Sedan). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW 330d F30

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km33 L consumed0.091 €/km70.63 €
Trip total70.63 €

Audi A5 Sedan

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km51 L consumed0.143 €/km111.00 €
Trip total111.00 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
4.7 L/100 km · 5.5 L/100 km
Fuel tank
57 L · 60 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWHybrid

330d F30

258 ch · 2013

AudiDiesel

A5 Sedan

204 ch · 2026

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

330d vs A5 Avant

AudiVSVolvo

A5 Sedan vs S60 B4

BMWVSAudi

330d vs A5 Sedan TDI quattro S tronic 150 kW

AudiVSBMW

A5 Sedan vs 320d

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the 330d F30 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 70.63 € (330d F30) and 111.00 € (A5 Sedan). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.