Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /small SUV
APumaPetrolvsBX1Diesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsPuma · X1

Ford Puma ST 200 vs BMW X1 sDrive20d F48

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

small SUV · 2021 vs 2018 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
FordPetrol

Puma ST 200

200 ch · 2021

VS
BMWDiesel

X1 sDrive20d F48

190 ch · 2018

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AFord Puma ST 200

7h01no stop

0 stops · 84.09 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BBMW X1 sDrive20d F48

7h01no stop

0 stops · 70.63 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasurePuma ST 200X1 sDrive20d F48Gap
Total time7h017h01Less than a minute apart
Charging stops0 stops0 stopsSame
Cost of energy used84.09 €70.63 €13.46 € · X1 sDrive20d F48

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

FordPetrol
Puma ST 200
100%
900 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
84.09 €
Cost of energy used
BMWDiesel
X1 sDrive20d F48
100%
1214 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
70.63 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the Puma ST 200 versus no stop for the X1 sDrive20d F48.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (6,0 L/100km for Puma ST 200 and 4,6 L/100km for X1 sDrive20d F48) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 5,0 L/100km (Puma ST 200) and 4,2 L/100km (X1 sDrive20d F48). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Ford Puma ST 200

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km39 L consumed0.108 €/km84.09 €
Trip total84.09 €

BMW X1 sDrive20d F48

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km33 L consumed0.091 €/km70.63 €
Trip total70.63 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
6.0 L/100 km · 4.6 L/100 km
Fuel tank
45 L · 51 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

FordPetrol

Puma ST 200

200 ch · 2021

BMWDiesel

X1 sDrive20d F48

190 ch · 2018

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

X1 sDrive20d vs Q3 Sportback

BMWVSPeugeot

X1 sDrive20d vs 3008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 sDrive20d

VolvoVSBMW

XC40 B4 vs X1 sDrive20d

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Puma ST 200 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 84.09 € (Puma ST 200) and 70.63 € (X1 sDrive20d F48). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.