Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact SUV
AX2vsBAtecaPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsX2 · Ateca

BMW X2 sDrive20i F39 vs Cupra Ateca

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2016 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrol

X2 sDrive20i F39

192 ch · 2018

VS
CupraPetrol

Ateca

190 ch · 2016

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

Manufacturer data being validated for this trip.

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrol
X2 sDrive20i F39
100%
1000 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
85.77 €
Cost of energy used
CupraPetrol
Ateca
Données insuffisantes pour la simulation

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
6.0 L/100 km · 7.0 L/100 km

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

X2 sDrive20i F39

192 ch · 2018

CupraPetrol

Ateca

190 ch · 2016

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X2 sDrive20i

VolvoVSBMW

XC40 B4 vs X2 sDrive20i

JaguarVSBMW

E-PACE P200 vs X2 sDrive20i

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs X2 sDrive20i