Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact
AFocusPetrolvsB120dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsFocus · 120d

Ford Focus ST 280 vs BMW 120d F40

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact · 2019 vs 2021 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
FordPetrol

Focus ST 280

280 ch · 2019

VS
BMWDiesel

120d F40

190 ch · 2021

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AFord Focus ST 280

7h01no stop

0 stops · 100.91 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BBMW 120d F40

7h01no stop

0 stops · 75.68 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureFocus ST 280120d F40Gap
Total time7h017h01Less than a minute apart
Charging stops0 stops0 stopsSame
Cost of energy used100.91 €75.68 €25.23 € · 120d F40

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

FordPetrol
Focus ST 280
100%
867 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
100.91 €
Cost of energy used
BMWDiesel
120d F40
100%
1111 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
75.68 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the Focus ST 280 versus no stop for the 120d F40.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,0 L/100km for Focus ST 280 and 4,7 L/100km for 120d F40) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 6,0 L/100km (Focus ST 280) and 4,5 L/100km (120d F40). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Ford Focus ST 280

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km47 L consumed0.130 €/km100.91 €
Trip total100.91 €

BMW 120d F40

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km35 L consumed0.098 €/km75.68 €
Trip total75.68 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
7.0 L/100 km · 4.7 L/100 km
Fuel tank
52 L · 50 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

FordPetrol

Focus ST 280

280 ch · 2019

BMWDiesel

120d F40

190 ch · 2021

Other duels you might be interested in

FordVSRenault

Focus ST 280 vs Megane 4 RS 280

BMWVSAudi

120d vs A3 Sedan

FordVSPeugeot

Focus ST 280 vs 308 GTi 270

BMWVSAudi

120d vs A3 Sportback

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Focus ST 280 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 100.91 € (Focus ST 280) and 75.68 € (120d F40). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.