Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact SUV
AE-PACEvsBQ3Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsE-PACE · Q3

Jaguar E-PACE P200 vs Audi Q3 Sportback

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact SUV · 2018 vs 2026 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

VS
AudiPetrol

Q3 Sportback

150 ch · 2026

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AJaguar E-PACE P200

7h06charging included

1 stop · 161.87 €

GapLess than a minute apart
BAudi Q3 Sportback

7h06charging included

1 stop · 140.85 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureE-PACE P200Q3 SportbackGap
Total time7h067h06Less than a minute apart
Charging stops1 stop1 stopSame
Cost of energy used161.87 €140.85 €21.02 € · Q3 Sportback

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

JaguarPetrol
E-PACE P200
100%
636 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +61 L · 132.80 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
161.87 €
Cost of energy used
AudiPetrol
Q3 Sportback
100%
591 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +50 L · 107.41 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
140.85 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the E-PACE P200 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Q3 Sportback.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (7,7 L/100km for E-PACE P200 and 6,7 L/100km for Q3 Sportback) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 9,6 L/100km (E-PACE P200) and 8,4 L/100km (Q3 Sportback). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Jaguar E-PACE P200

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L636 km61 L consumed0.209 €/km132.80 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L139 km13 L consumed0.209 €/km29.06 €
Trip total161.87 €

Audi Q3 Sportback

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L591 km50 L consumed0.182 €/km107.41 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L184 km15 L consumed0.182 €/km33.43 €
Trip total140.85 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
7.7 L/100 km · 6.7 L/100 km
Fuel tank
68 L · 55 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 ch · 2018

AudiPetrol

Q3 Sportback

150 ch · 2026

Other duels you might be interested in

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 sDrive18i

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X2 sDrive18i

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the E-PACE P200 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 161.87 € (E-PACE P200) and 140.85 € (Q3 Sportback). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.