Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AMacanvsBKadjarPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsMacan · Kadjar

Porsche Macan vs Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2019 vs 2019 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
PorschePetrol

Macan

245 ch · 2019

VS
RenaultPetrolPlus rapide

Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC

160 ch · 2019

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

APorsche Macan

7h06charging included

1 stop · 216.53 €

Gap5 minin favour of Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
BRenault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC

7h01no stop

0 stops · 84.09 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureMacanKadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDCGap
Total time7h067h015 min · Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
Cost of energy used216.53 €84.09 €132.44 € · Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

PorschePetrol
Macan
100%
524 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +67 L · 146.38 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
216.53 €
Cost of energy used
RenaultPetrolFastest
Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
100%
1100 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
84.09 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Macan.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,3 L/100km for Macan and 6,0 L/100km for Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 12,9 L/100km (Macan) and 5,0 L/100km (Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Porsche Macan

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L524 km67 L consumed0.279 €/km146.38 €
Valence, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L251 km32 L consumed0.279 €/km70.15 €
Trip total216.53 €

Renault Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km39 L consumed0.108 €/km84.09 €
Trip total84.09 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.3 L/100 km · 6.0 L/100 km
Fuel tank
75.0 L · 55 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

PorschePetrol

Macan

245 ch · 2019

RenaultPetrol

Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC

160 ch · 2019

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSPorsche

X3 xDrive30i vs Macan

RenaultVSAudi

Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC vs Q3 Sportback

BMWVSPorsche

X3 xDrive30i vs Macan

RenaultVSAudi

Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC vs Q3 SUV

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 216.53 € (Macan) and 84.09 € (Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.