RenaultPetrol
Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC
160 ch · 2019
Motorway range comparison
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
| Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC | Niro HEV FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h01−5 min | 7h06 |
| Charging stops | 0 stops−1 stop | 1 stop |
| Total cost | 77,11 €−7,71 € | 84,82 € |
Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.
Analysis
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Niro HEV FWD.
The official WLTP figures (6,0 L/100km for Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC and 4,8 L/100km for Niro HEV FWD) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 5,0 L/100km (Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC) and 5,5 L/100km (Niro HEV FWD). Full methodology: see the dedicated button above the summary.
The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.
| Segment | Distance | €/km | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Marseillefuel · 1,99 €/L | 775 km39 L consumed | 0,099 €/km | 77,11 € |
| Trip total | 77,11 € | ||
| Segment | Distance | €/km | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 1,99 €/L | 687 km38 L consumed | 0,109 €/km | 75,22 € |
| Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 1,99 €/L | 88 km5 L consumed | 0,109 €/km | 9,60 € |
| Trip total | 84,82 € | ||
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
160 ch · 2019
141 ch · 2023
On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC arrives in 7h01 with 0 stop.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
Electric: 77,11 € (Kadjar 1.3 TCe 160 EDC) and 84,82 € (Niro HEV FWD). An equivalent petrol SUV (~8 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in motorway fuel. Electric costs less in energy but adds charging stops.