SG2 · GENERATION 2023 · COMPACT SUV
KiaHEV

Niro HEV FWD

141 hp, 11,0 s 0-100 : among the 31 C-SUV 2021–2025, the Niro HEV FWD ranks 2nd of 31 in Combined consumption, 18th of 29 in Tank range, 31th of 31 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,23815,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

141hp

265 Nm · 44 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

11.0s

VMax 165 km/h

Cons.

4.8L

/100 km

Tank

42L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Kia Niro HEV FWD

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Puissance électrique44 hp
Combined power141 hp
Couple265 Nm
GearboxDual Clutch 6 rapports Automatic
TransmissionFWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4,8 L/100km
Tank42 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h11,0 s
VMax165 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width1,845 mm
Height1,645 mm
Kerb weight1,480 kg
Cd0.29

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 31 C-SUV, the Niro HEV FWD ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 31 in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (1st with 1063 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.8 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 31 in Combined consumption)

The Niro HEV FWD consumes 4.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 875 km (18th of 29 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Niro HEV FWD covers 875 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1063 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Niro HEV FWD stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 31 C-SUV marketed between 2021–2025.

Combined consumption

2eout of 31

4.8 L/100
Min7.8 L/100 · SEAT Ateca 2.0 TSI 190 FR 4Drive 7DSG
Max4.8 L/100 · Bmw X2 sDrive18d

Tank range

18eout of 29

875 km
Min705 km · SEAT Ateca 2.0 TSI 190 FR 4Drive 7DSG
Max1 063 km · Bmw X2 sDrive18d

0–100 km/h

31eout of 31

11,0 s
Min11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Max4,9 s · Bmw X2 M35i

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Niro HEV FWD

Take the next step

Find a Niro HEV FWD or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Kia Niro HEV FWD: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the Niro HEV FWD rank in its segment?#

Among the 31 C-SUV 2021–2025, the Niro HEV FWD ranks 2nd of 31 in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 18th of 29 in Tank range (875 km, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 31th of 31 in 0–100 km/h (11.0 s, behind the Bmw X2 M35i).

What is the range of the Niro HEV FWD?#

875 km on a full tank (4.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 18th of 29 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the Niro HEV FWD cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X2 sDrive18d instead?#

The Bmw X2 sDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 4.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Niro HEV FWD vs Bmw X2 sDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.