Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact
AMegane 4vsBFocusPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsMegane 4 · Focus

Renault Megane 4 RS 280 vs Ford Focus ST 250 Gen3

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact · 2018 vs 2015 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
RenaultPetrol

Megane 4 RS 280

280 ch · 2018

VS
FordPetrolPlus rapide

Focus ST 250 Gen3

250 ch · 2015

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ARenault Megane 4 RS 280

7h06charging included

1 stop · 163.47 €

Gap5 minin favour of Focus ST 250 Gen3
BFord Focus ST 250 Gen3

7h01no stop

0 stops · 95.86 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureMegane 4 RS 280Focus ST 250 Gen3Gap
Total time7h067h015 min · Focus ST 250 Gen3
Charging stops1 stop0 stops1 stop · Focus ST 250 Gen3
Cost of energy used163.47 €95.86 €67.61 € · Focus ST 250 Gen3

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

RenaultPetrol
Megane 4 RS 280
100%
463 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +45 L · 97.65 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
163.47 €
Cost of energy used
FordPetrolFastest
Focus ST 250 Gen3
100%
1088 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h01
0
Stops
7h01
Duration
95.86 €
Cost of energy used

The 5-minute lead of the Focus ST 250 Gen3 does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (0 vs 1).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: no stop for the Focus ST 250 Gen3 versus 1 stop of 5 min for the Megane 4 RS 280.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (8,1 L/100km for Megane 4 RS 280 and 6,8 L/100km for Focus ST 250 Gen3) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 9,7 L/100km (Megane 4 RS 280) and 5,7 L/100km (Focus ST 250 Gen3). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Renault Megane 4 RS 280

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L463 km45 L consumed0.211 €/km97.65 €
Limonest, A6 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L312 km30 L consumed0.211 €/km65.82 €
Trip total163.47 €

Ford Focus ST 250 Gen3

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L775 km44 L consumed0.124 €/km95.86 €
Trip total95.86 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
8.1 L/100 km · 6.8 L/100 km
Fuel tank
50 L · 62 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

RenaultPetrol

Megane 4 RS 280

280 ch · 2018

FordPetrol

Focus ST 250 Gen3

250 ch · 2015

Other duels you might be interested in

FordVSRenault

Focus ST 280 vs Megane 4 RS 280

BMWVSFord

230i vs Focus ST 250 Gen3

RenaultVSPeugeot

Megane 4 RS 280 vs 308 GTi 270

BMWVSFord

230i vs Focus ST 250 Gen3

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Focus ST 250 Gen3 arrives in 7h01 with 0 fuel stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 163.47 € (Megane 4 RS 280) and 95.86 € (Focus ST 250 Gen3). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.