F44 · GENERATION 2020 · COMPACT
BMWICE

216d Gran Coupe

116 hp, 10,3 s 0-100 : among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the 216d Gran Coupe ranks 2nd of 137 in Combined consumption, 31th of 130 in Tank range, 122th of 143 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,34715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

116hp

270 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

10.3s

VMax 200 km/h

Cons.

4.1L

/100 km

Tank

42L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 216d Gran Coupe

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Architecture3 cyl.
Displacement1,496 cm³
Power116 hp
Couple270 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 7 rapports Automatique

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.1 L/100km
Tank42 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h10,3 s
VMax200 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,526 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,800 mm
Height1,420 mm
Boot430 L
Kerb weight1,430 kg
Cd0.25
CO₂ WLTP108 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 143 compacts, the 216d Gran Coupe ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 2nd of 137 in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100), 31th of 130 in Tank range (1024 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 3.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 216d Steptronic (1st with 1308 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.1 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 137 in Combined consumption)

The 216d Gran Coupe consumes 4.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 216d Steptronic (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 1024 km (31th of 130 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 216d Gran Coupe covers 1024 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1308 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 216d Gran Coupe stands against compacts

Comparison across 143 compacts marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption2e / 137
4.1 L/100
Min 10 L/100 · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 3.9 L/100 · Bmw 216d Steptronic
Tank range31e / 130
1 024 km
Min 520 km · Bmw M2 CompetitionMax 1 308 km · Bmw 216d Steptronic
0–100 km/h122e / 143
10,3 s
Min 12,3 s · Hyundai i30 1.5 DPi 110 PSMax 4,4 s · Bmw M140i xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 2 Series F44 range

Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F44

Compare

Popular duels involving the 216d Gran Coupe

Frequently asked questions

BMW 216d Gran Coupe: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 143 compacts 2018–2022, the 216d Gran Coupe ranks 2nd of 137 in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 31th of 130 in Tank range (1024 km, behind the Bmw 216d Steptronic), 122th of 143 in 0–100 km/h (10.3 s, behind the Bmw M140i xDrive).

1024 km on a full tank (4.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 31th of 130 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 216d Steptronic leads in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100 vs 4.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 216d Gran Coupe vs Bmw 216d Steptronic duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.