BMW 216i Active Tourer
109 hp, 11,3 s 0-100 : among the 38 M 2018–2022, the 216i Active Tourer ranks 26th of 38 in Combined consumption, 26th of 37 in Tank range, 30th of 38 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 109 hp
- 190 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 11.3 s
- VMax 190 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 3 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,499 cm³
- Power
- 109 hp
- Couple
- 190 Nm
- Gearbox
- Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 51 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 11,3 s
- VMax
- 190 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,354 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,800 mm
- Height
- 1,555 mm
- Boot
- 468 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,365 kg
- Cd
- 0.27
- CO₂ WLTP
- 129 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 38 M, the 216i Active Tourer ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 216d Active Tourer (1st with 4.0 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 216d Active Tourer (1st with 1275 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (26th of 38 in Combined consumption)
The 216i Active Tourer consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 216d Active Tourer (4.0 L/100).
Tank range: 911 km (26th of 37 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 216i Active Tourer covers 911 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1275 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 216i Active Tourer stands against M
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 2 Series F44 range
Generation F44 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F44
Popular duels involving the 216i Active Tourer
Continue with the BMW 216i Active Tourer
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 216i Active Tourer: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 216i Active Tourer rank in its segment?
Among the 38 M 2018–2022, the 216i Active Tourer ranks 26th of 38 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the BMW 216d Active Tourer), 26th of 37 in Tank range (911 km, behind the BMW 216d Active Tourer), 30th of 38 in 0–100 km/h (11.3 s, behind the BMW 225i xDrive Active Tourer).
What is the range of the 216i Active Tourer?
911 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 26th of 37 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the 216i Active Tourer cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 216d Active Tourer instead?
The BMW 216d Active Tourer leads in Combined consumption (4.0 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 216i Active Tourer vs BMW 216d Active Tourer duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.