Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d xDrive G20 gagne (6,96 s vs 7,79 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A5 Sedan | 320d xDrive G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,79 s | 6,96 s+0,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 15,06 s+0,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,63 s | 27,83 s+0,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 242 km/h+9 km/h | 233 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,92 kg/hp | 8,53 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A5 Sedan | 320d xDrive G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,26 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,04 s | 2,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,46 s | 4,73 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,79 s | 6,96 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,74 s | 9,86 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,81 s | 18,39 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 34,87 s | 34,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 15,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,63 s | 27,83 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 620 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d xDrive hits 100 km/h in 6.96 s versus 7.79 s for the A5 Sedan. At this point, the Bmw 320d xDrive leads by 0.83 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d xDrive is doing 119 km/h against 117 km/h for the A5 Sedan. The gap is 0.62 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d xDrive crosses the line in 15.06 s versus 15.74 s. The 0.68 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 165 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d xDrive finishes in 27.83 s versus 28.62 s, with a 0.80 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (242 vs 233 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Bmw 320d xDrive features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the A5 Sedan’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the A5 Sedan is capped at 242 km/h, the Bmw 320d xDrive at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.92 kg/hp vs 8.53 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.41 seconds. The 0.83 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d xDrive G20 gagne (6,96 s vs 7,79 s).
A5 Sedan passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,79 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A5 Sedan : 204 hp, ratio 8,92 kg/hp. 320d xDrive G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,53 kg/hp.
A5 Sedan : 242 km/h. 320d xDrive G20 : 233 km/h.