Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Consumption›Audi e-tron vs BMW M240i

Consumption comparison

Audi e-tron GT quattro vs BMW M240i F44: how much do I save per year?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

AudiBEVMost economical

e-tron GT quattro

97 kWh · 2026

12,2 L/100km

VS
BMWPetrol

M240i F44

52 L · 2020

7,3 L/100km

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

5 000 km50 000 km

Simulated driving mix

Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust

Charging type

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,19 €/kWh)

AudiBEVMost economical

e-tron GT quattro

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

362€

2,41 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 182 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
12,7 kWh/100km
Energy rate
0,19 €/kWh · home
Energy used
1903,2 kWh per year
BMWPetrol

M240i F44

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

2 307€

15,38 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 1 160 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
7,7 L/100km
Fuel price
1,99 €/L
Fuel used
1159,5 L per year
Annual gap e-tron GT quattro vs M240i+1 946 €/an≈ 978 L petrol 95

Audi e-tron GT quattro costs 1 946 €/an less in energy than BMW M240i F44, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.

≈ 978 L of petrol 95 saved per year

By charging mix:
  • Home+1 908 €/an
  • AC station+1 736 €/an
  • Fast DC+1 451 €/an

Your savings over the ownership period

Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

1 year

1 946 €

≈ 978 L petrol 95

3 years

5 837 €

≈ 2933 L petrol 95

5 years

9 729 €

≈ 4889 L petrol 95

10 years

19 458 €

≈ 9778 L petrol 95

Cumulative savings for Audi e-tron GT quattro versus BMW M240i F44. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.

Annual cost breakdown by charging mix

Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.

Audi

e-tron GT quattro

Charging mixkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh15 000 km1 830 kWh0,027 €/km400 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh15 000 km1 830 kWh0,038 €/km571 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh15 000 km1 830 kWh0,057 €/km856 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC15 000 km1 830 kWh0,030 €/km448 €
Annual total (typical mix)448 €
BMW

M240i F44

Fuelkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
Annual fuel1,99 €/L15 000 km0,154 €/km2 307 €

Other similar comparisons

AudiVSBmw

e-tron GT quattro vs 540i xDrive

AudiVSBmw

e-tron GT quattro vs 620d Gran Turismo

AudiVSBmw

e-tron GT quattro vs 330i xDrive Sedan

AudiVSBmw

A5 Sedan TDI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs M240i

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi e-tron GT quattro is about 80% cheaper than the BMW M240i with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices — simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Audi e-tron GT quattro is 574 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Audi e-tron GT quattro is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.