Among the 15 grand tourers electric 2024–2028, the e-tron GT quattro ranks 8th of 14 in WLTP range (574 km, behind the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW), 1st of 13 in DC charge power (320 kW, behind the Audi e-tron GT quattro), 7th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (4.2 s, behind the Audi S e-tron GT).
e-tron GT quattro
577 hp, 574 km range, 4,2 s 0-100 : among the 15 grand tourers electric 2024–2028, the e-tron GT quattro ranks 8th of 14 in WLTP range, 1st of 13 in DC charge power, 7th of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
577hp
830 Nm · 503 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
4.2s
VMax 245 km/h
Range
574km
WLTP
DC charging
320kW
Full specifications Audi e-tron GT quattro
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 503 hp |
| Combined power | 577 hp |
| Couple | 830 Nm |
| Transmission | AWD |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 97 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 574 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 320 kW |
| Cons. WLTP | 12,2 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,2 s |
| VMax | 245 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,997 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,900 mm |
| Width | 1,964 mm |
| Height | 1,369 mm |
| Boot | 405 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,280 kg |
| Cd | 0.25 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 0 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 15 grand tourers electric, the e-tron GT quattro ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety. 1st of 13 in DC charge power (320 kW).
If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (1st with 730 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi S e-tron GT (1st with 3.3 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 574 km WLTP (8th of 14 in WLTP range)
The e-tron GT quattro offers 574 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).
Charging: 320 kW DC (1st of 13 in DC charge power)
The e-tron GT quattro accepts up to 320 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Audi e-tron GT quattro (320 kW).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the e-tron GT quattro stands against grand tourers electric
Comparison across 15 grand tourers electric marketed between 2024–2028.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the e-tron GT quattro
Audi e-tron GT quattro: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
574 km WLTP announced — making it the 8th of 14 in autonomie du segment out of 14 models. The reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW leads in WLTP range (730 km vs 574 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the e-tron GT quattro vs Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.