On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW is about 25% cheaper than the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
518 €per year
17,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.45 € per 100 km · 2 590 kWh per year
400 €per year
13,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 2.66 € per 100 km · 1 997 kWh per year
| Profile | Split | AA · Scenic | BB · Q4 40 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City70 / 25 / 5 | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 441 € | 340 € | 101 € · Q4 40 |
| Mixed30 / 50 / 20 | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 518 € | 400 € | 119 € · Q4 40 |
| Long-distance10 / 40 / 50 | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 613 € | 473 € | 140 € · Q4 40 |
Cumulative saving for the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW
Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW is about 25% cheaper than the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 offers more range: 620 km vs 370 km for Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.