AudiPetrol
Q7 SUV
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
2 139€
14,26 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 1 075 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 8,1 L/100km
- Fuel price
- 1,75 €/L
- Fuel used
- 1222,2 L per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 1,99 €/L·Diesel : 1,75 €/L
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
14,26 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 1 075 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
12,50 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 942 L of petrol 95 per year
Ford Puma ST 200 costs 264 €/an less in energy than Audi Q7 SUV, over 15 000 km for this driving mix.
≈ 151 L of diesel saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
264 €
≈ 133 L petrol 95
3 years
793 €
≈ 398 L petrol 95
5 years
1 322 €
≈ 664 L petrol 95
10 years
2 643 €
≈ 1328 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for Ford Puma ST 200 versus Audi Q7 SUV. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year.
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,75 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,143 €/km | 2 139 € |
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,125 €/km | 1 875 € |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford Puma ST 200 is about 10% cheaper than the Audi Q7 SUV with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The Ford Puma ST 200 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.