Aller au contenu principal
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
Home›Consumption›Audi S6 vs Ford Explorer

Consumption comparison

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron vs Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300: how much do I save per year?

Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.

AudiBEVMost economical

S6 Sportback e-tron

94.4 kWh · 2026

16,5 kWh/100km

VS
FordPetrol

Explorer EcoBoost 300

73 L · 2020

9,8 L/100km

MotorwayRange & chargingPerformance0-100, top speedConsumptionAnnual TCO

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

5 000 km50 000 km

Simulated driving mix

Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust

Charging type

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway · charging home (0,21 €/kWh)

AudiBEVMost economical

S6 Sportback e-tron

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

541€

3,60 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 272 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
17,2 kWh/100km
Energy rate
0,21 €/kWh · home
Energy used
2574,0 kWh per year
FordPetrol

Explorer EcoBoost 300

Annual energy cost · 15 000 km

3 057€

20,38 € / 100 km

Equivalent to 1 536 L of petrol 95 per year

Weighted consumption
10,2 L/100km
Fuel price
1,99 €/L
Fuel used
1536,0 L per year
Annual gap S6 Sportback e-tron vs Explorer EcoBoost 300+2 516 €/an≈ 1264 L petrol 95

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron costs 2 516 €/an less in energy than Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300, over 15 000 kmwith home for this driving mix.

≈ 1264 L of petrol 95 saved per year

By charging mix:
  • Home+2 516 €/an
  • AC station+2 284 €/an
  • Fast DC+1 898 €/an

Your savings over the ownership period

Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.

Annual mileage

15 000 km/an

1 year

2 516 €

≈ 1264 L petrol 95

3 years

7 548 €

≈ 3793 L petrol 95

5 years

12 581 €

≈ 6322 L petrol 95

10 years

25 161 €

≈ 12644 L petrol 95

Cumulative savings for Audi S6 Sportback e-tron versus Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.

Annual cost breakdown by charging mix

Projection over 15 000 km/year, by proportion of each charging type.

Audi

S6 Sportback e-tron

Charging mixkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
100% Homeoff-peak rate · 0,21 €/kWh15 000 km2 475 kWh0,036 €/km541 €
100% AC stationpublic AC rate · 0,30 €/kWh15 000 km2 475 kWh0,051 €/km772 €
100% Fast DCDC motorway rate · 0,45 €/kWh15 000 km2 475 kWh0,077 €/km1 158 €
Typical mix80% home · 15% AC · 5% DC15 000 km2 475 kWh0,040 €/km606 €
Annual total (typical mix)606 €
Ford

Explorer EcoBoost 300

Fuelkm/year€/kmAnnual cost
Annual fuel1,99 €/L15 000 km0,204 €/km3 057 €

Other similar comparisons

AudiVSPorsche

S6 Sportback e-tron vs Taycan 4S

FordVSPorsche

Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Cayenne (6-speed manual)

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan 4S Cross Turismo vs S6 Sportback e-tron

FordVSPorsche

Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Cayenne (6-speed manual)

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron is about 80% cheaper than the Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

The declared range of the Audi S6 Sportback e-tron is 594 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.

The Audi S6 Sportback e-tron is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.