Among the 27 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 ranks 8th of 26 in Combined consumption (9.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive25d), 11th of 25 in Tank range (745 km, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive25d), 25th of 27 in 0–100 km/h (6.8 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).
VI · GENERATION 2020 → · LARGE SUV
FordICE
Explorer EcoBoost 300
305 hp, 6,8 s 0-100 : among the 27 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 ranks 8th of 26 in Combined consumption, 11th of 25 in Tank range, 25th of 27 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
305hp
420 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.8s
VMax 220 km/h
Cons.
9.8L
/100 km
Tank
73L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 305 hp |
| Couple | 420 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 10 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9,8 L/100km |
| Tank | 73 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,8 s |
| VMax | 220 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 2,012 mm |
| Height | 1,778 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,043 kg |
| Cd | 0.38 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 27 E-SUV, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 ranks (top 8 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
E-SUV among the best in segment: 8th of 26 in Combined consumption (9.8 L/100).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X5 xDrive25d (1st with 6.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X5 xDrive25d (1st with 1290 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 9.8 L/100 L/100 (8th of 26 in Combined consumption)
The Explorer EcoBoost 300 consumes 9.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X5 xDrive25d (6.2 L/100).
Tank range: 745 km (11th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 covers 745 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1290 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Explorer EcoBoost 300 stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 27 E-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption8e / 26
9.8 L/100
Min 13.7 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Turbo CoupeMax 6.2 L/100 · Bmw X5 xDrive25d
Tank range11e / 25
745 km
Min 173 km · Porsche Cayenne Turbo CoupeMax 1 290 km · Bmw X5 xDrive25d
0–100 km/h25e / 27
6,8 s
Min 7,5 s · Bmw X5 xDrive25dMax 3,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cayenne (6-speed manual)304 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Cayenne (6-speed manual)304 hp · 0-100 7.2 s
Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)304 hp · 0-100 7.5 s
Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)304 hp · 0-100 7.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Explorer EcoBoost 300
Frequently asked questions
Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
745 km on a full tank (9.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 11th of 25 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X5 xDrive25d leads in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100 vs 9.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Explorer EcoBoost 300 vs Bmw X5 xDrive25d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.