RenaultHybrid
Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
1 158€
7,72 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 582 L of petrol 95 per year
- Weighted consumption
- 3,9 L/100km
- Fuel price
- 1,99 €/L
- Fuel used
- 582,0 L per year
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 1,99 €/L·Diesel : 1,75 €/L
Typical annual usage : Mix 30% city / 50% road / 20% motorway
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
7,72 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 582 L of petrol 95 per year
Annual energy cost · 15 000 km
7,70 € / 100 km
Equivalent to 580 L of petrol 95 per year
BMW 216d F22 costs 3 €/an less in energy than Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160, over 15 000 km for this driving mix.
≈ 2 L of petrol 95 saved per year
Cumulative projection by annual mileage. The cheaper-to-run vehicle widens the gap year after year.
1 year
3 €
≈ 2 L petrol 95
3 years
10 €
≈ 5 L petrol 95
5 years
16 €
≈ 8 L petrol 95
10 years
32 €
≈ 16 L petrol 95
Cumulative savings for BMW 216d F22 versus Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160. Excluding purchase, insurance, maintenance and depreciation.
Projection over 15 000 km/year.
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,99 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,077 €/km | 1 158 € |
| Fuel | km/year | €/km | Annual cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fuel1,75 €/L | 15 000 km | 0,077 €/km | 1 155 € |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 and BMW 216d have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
The BMW 216d is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.