Sur 0–100 km/h, Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 gagne (8,73 s vs 11,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 | 216d F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,73 s−2,50 s | 11,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,40 s−1,81 s | 18,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,70 s−2,95 s | 32,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 195 km/h−15 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,24 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 | 216d F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,82 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,45 s | 4,62 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,07 s | 8,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,73 s | 11,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,64 s | 15,50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,08 s | 29,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,40 s | 18,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,70 s | 32,65 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp | E4 |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | E-Tech Multi-Mode dog-clutch (ICE: 4-speed, EV: 2-speed) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 420 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 hits 100 km/h in 8.73 s versus 11.23 s for the Bmw 216d. At this point, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads by 2.50 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 is doing 114 km/h against 105 km/h for the Bmw 216d. The gap is 1.32 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 crosses the line in 16.39 s versus 18.21 s. The 1.82 s gap represents roughly 64 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 157 km/h versus 146 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 finishes in 29.70 s versus 32.65 s, with a 2.95 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (195 km/h), the Bmw 216d never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 is capped at 180 km/h, the Bmw 216d at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.56 kg/hp vs 12.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.17 seconds. The 2.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 gagne (8,73 s vs 11,23 s).
Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,73 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 : 160 hp, ratio 8,56 kg/hp. 216d F22 : 116 hp, ratio 12,24 kg/hp.
Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 : 180 km/h. 216d F22 : 195 km/h.