V · GENERATION 2025 · CITY CAR
RenaultHEV

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

160 hp, 8,6 s 0-100 : among the 9 city cars hybrid 2023–2027, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 ranks 1st of 9 in Combined consumption, 1st of 9 in Tank range, 3rd of 9 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,18215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

160hp

205 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

8.6s

VMax 180 km/h

Cons.

3.9L

/100 km

Tank

41L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureElectric · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,798 cm³
Power160 hp
Couple205 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 4 rapports Automatique
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP3.9 L/100km
Tank41 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h8,6 s
VMax180 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,120 mm
Wheelbase2,588 mm
Width1,812 mm
Height1,447 mm
Kerb weight1,370 kg
Cd0.31

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 9 city cars hybrid, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 9 in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100), 1st of 9 in Tank range (1051 km), 3rd of 9 in 0–100 km/h (8.6 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6 (1st with 8.0 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 3.9 L/100 L/100 (1st of 9 in Combined consumption)

The Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 consumes 3.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 (3.9 L/100).

Tank range: 1051 km (1st of 9 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 covers 1051 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1051 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 stands against city cars hybrid

Comparison across 9 city cars hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.

Combined consumption1e / 9
3.9 L/100
Min 5.8 L/100 · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 3.9 L/100 · Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
Tank range1e / 9
1 051 km
Min 690 km · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 1 051 km · Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
0–100 km/h3e / 9
8,6 s
Min 11,4 s · Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 PS 48VMax 8,0 s · Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Renault Clio V range

Generation V launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the V

Compare

Popular duels involving the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

Frequently asked questions

Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 9 city cars hybrid 2023–2027, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 ranks 1st of 9 in Combined consumption (3.9 L/100, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 1st of 9 in Tank range (1051 km, behind the Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160), 3rd of 9 in 0–100 km/h (8.6 s, behind the Peugeot 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6).

1051 km on a full tank (3.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 9 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.