Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
XMvs520ePHEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsXM · 520e

BMW XM 50e G09 vs BMW 520e G30: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile, how you charge and the share of the trip driven on electricity or fuel.

luxury SUV · 2024 vs 2021 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Fuel price
Petrol 95 2.17 €/L · Diesel 2.38 €/Lprix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 05/10/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
Charging type

Result · yearly energy cost

ABMW XM 50e G09

1,303 €per year

33,5 kWh/100 km weighted · 8.68 € per 100 km · 1 185 L per year

Gap184 € per yearin favour of the 520e (−14 %)≈ 85 L petrol 95
BBMW 520e G30

1,118 €per year

22,4 kWh/100 km weighted · 7.46 € per 100 km · 1 323 L per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · XMBB · 520eGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway1,303 €1,118 €184 € · 520e
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway1,303 €1,118 €184 € · 520e
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway1,303 €1,118 €184 € · 520e

Cumulative saving for the 520e

1 year
184 €
3 years
552 €
5 years
920 €
10 years
1,840 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
32.2 kWh/100 km · 21.5 kWh/100 km
Powertrain
Plug-in hybrid · Plug-in hybrid
Power
476 ch · 204 ch
Kerb weight
2,620 kg · 1,900 kg

Other similar comparisons

BMWVSMercedes

XM 50e vs G 500

gap 3 842 €/year
AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs 520e

gap 341 €/year
BMWVSMercedes

XM 50e vs G 500

gap 3 842 €/year
AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs 520e

gap 402 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW 520e is about 15% cheaper than the BMW XM 50e with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

BMW XM 50e offers more range: 77 km vs 52 km for BMW 520e. In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.

The BMW 520e is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.