On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford F-150 Lightning 452 is about 70% cheaper than the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
843 €per year
28,1 kWh/100 km weighted · 5.62 € per 100 km · 4 212 kWh per year
2,662 €per year
7,9 L/100 km weighted · 17.74 € per 100 km · 1 185 L per year
| Profile | Split | F-150 | Ranger | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 717 € | 2,982 € | 2,264 € · F-150 |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 843 € | 2,662 € | 1,819 € · F-150 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 997 € | 2,426 € | 1,429 € · F-150 |
Cumulative saving for the F-150 Lightning 452
Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Ford F-150 Lightning 452 is about 70% cheaper than the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The declared range of the Ford F-150 Lightning 452 is 483 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The Ford F-150 Lightning 452 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.