Among the 4 LCV 2021–2025, the Ranger EcoBlue 170 ranks Combined consumption (7.5 L/100, behind the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170), Tank range (1067 km, behind the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170), 0–100 km/h (11.1 s, behind the Ford F-150 Raptor EcoBoost 450).
III · GENERATION 2023 → · LCV
FordICE
Ranger EcoBlue 170
170 hp, 11,1 s 0-100 : among the 4 LCV 2021–2025, the Ranger EcoBlue 170 ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
170hp
405 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
11.1s
VMax 177 km/h
Cons.
7.5L
/100 km
Tank
80L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 170 hp |
| Couple | 405 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.5 L/100km |
| Tank | 80 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 11,1 s |
| VMax | 177 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,860 mm |
| Height | 1,815 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,956 kg |
| Cd | 0.440269656866477 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 4 LCV, the Ranger EcoBlue 170 ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
LCV among the best in segment: Combined consumption (7.5 L/100), Tank range (1067 km).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,5 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Ford F-150 Raptor EcoBoost 450 (1st with 5.4 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.5 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The Ranger EcoBlue 170 consumes 7.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170 (7.5 L/100).
Tank range: 1067 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the Ranger EcoBlue 170 covers 1067 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1067 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Ranger EcoBlue 170 stands against LCV
Comparison across 4 LCV marketed between 2021–2025.
Combined consumption1e / 4
7.5 L/100
Min 14.7 L/100 · Ford F-150 Raptor EcoBoost 450Max 7.5 L/100 · Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170
Tank range1e / 4
1 067 km
Min 580 km · Ford Ranger Raptor V6 292Max 1 067 km · Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170
0–100 km/h4e / 4
11,1 s
Min 11,1 s · Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170Max 5,4 s · Ford F-150 Raptor EcoBoost 450
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Frequently asked questions
Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1067 km on a full tank (7.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.